Sunday, November 18, 2007

Dalai Lama-"half-Marxist, half-Buddhist"‏

From: http://hhdl.dharmakara.net/hhdlquotes1.html#marxism

Q: You have often stated that you would like to achieve a synthesis between Buddhism and Marxism. What is the appeal of Marxism for you?

A: Of all the modern economic theories, the economic system of Marxism is founded on moral principles, while capitalism is concerned only with gain and profitability. Marxism is concerned with the distribution of wealth on an equal basis and the equitable utilization of the means of production. It is also concerned with the fate of the working classes--that is, the majority--as well as with the fate of those who are underprivileged and in need, and Marxism cares about the victims of minority-imposed exploitation. For those reasons the system appeals to me, and it seems fair. I just recently read an article in a paper where His Holiness the Pope also pointed out some positive aspects of Marxism.

As for the failure of the Marxist regimes, first of all I do not consider the former USSR, or China, or even Vietnam, to have been true Marxist regimes, for they were far more concerned with their narrow national interests than with the Workers' International; this is why there were conflicts, for example, between China and the USSR, or between China and Vietnam. If those three regimes had truly been based upon Marxist principles, those conflicts would never have occurred.

I think the major flaw of the Marxist regimes is that they have placed too much emphasis on the need to destroy the ruling class, on class struggle, and this causes them to encourage hatred and to neglect compassion. Although their initial aim might have been to serve the cause of the majority, when they try to implement it all their energy is deflected into destructive activities. Once the revolution is over and the ruling class is destroyed, there is nor much left to offer the people; at this point the entire country is impoverished and unfortunately it is almost as if the initial aim were to become poor. I think that this is due to the lack of human solidarity and compassion. The principal disadvantage of such a regime is the insistence placed on hatred to the detriment of compassion.

The failure of the regime in the former Soviet Union was, for me, not the failure of Marxism but the failure of totalitarianism. For this reason I still think of myself as half-Marxist, half-Buddhist.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also quoted here the Dalai Lama is said to have told an audience :



'I am humanitarian Marxist, I am Buddhist Marxist, I am not nationalistic Marxist, I am also a socialist. Marxist economic theory is for all,' the Dalai Lama said. 'It propagates for equal distribution and Marxism and Buddhism are working in a similar line. I am totally against totalitarian system and using force,' the Buddhist leader added.

I wonder if this recent revelation by the Dalai Lama (half-Marxist, half-Buddist) will cost him U.S. support, as Tibet is cause de celebrete amongst the bougeois American Left.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

He is no marxist, he is a feudal theocrat.

he is probably trying to kiss the ass of the chinese "communists" so that they can give him a slice of the chinese bureacracy.

Marxism is humanism, but marxism is not a "moral" philosophy. Marxism is just an attempt to make a theoretical framework out of the past historical struggles against civilization and class society. It has more to do with the affirmation of life, total emancipation and the construction of a society based on creative genius than christian or buddhist "altruism" which is based more on masochistic self-sacrifice than pursuing freedom and emancipation.

The Stalinist counterrevolution, both in the ideological and practical realm, made the communist and socialist struggle "christian" and "ascetic", rather than the struggle for life and for one's self-interests. In short, socialism has nothing to do with moral ascetism, and it has everything to do with "greed" in as much as we understand that beyond stale,miserable, alienating, and boring capitalism, there is a world of pleasures awaiting for us.

Anonymous said...

Amir
Like so many antique Persian hardliners, the death of tens of millions by various means by Mao does not mean a thing to you. For me you are no different than a supporter of Stalin or Hitler.